About Me

Name: Ernie
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Donkey Cons: High School History Text

I'm about midway through the book Donkey Cons and I can only conclude that it needs to be required reading in high school history classes. Certainly in adult education.
 
I have seen many books that attempt to revise history, calling historical truth lies, and doing so with virtually no contextual documentation. "Don't Know Much About History", "Lies We Learned In School" and other such books litter the bookscape and linger on the shelves for years, if not decades. Those authors clearly find historical truth distasteful, and have endeavored to set the record... crooked.

Twenty years ago, I bought and read some of these books, thinking I was learning something new and gaining a sense of enlightenment, maybe feeling a little bit like an 'insider' who knew the truth that no one else had. In time, I began to learn that those authors were not telling me the truth, that it was really one world-view against another, and that I just didn't have a way of knowing who is and is not telling the truth.

Armed with a more discerning eye, I continued to seek out honesty. An annoying little belief system came to light which I have a lot of trouble with: "History is written by the victors". This statement could be true if it weren't for free societies. The Soviet Union tried for decades to supress the truth, to control what their people could know. Today, China and other countries continue this silliness in vain. In the USA, there's not even a pretense of truth to that statement. Bookstores and libraries have an annual Banned Books week, sponsored by the American Library Association. What an irony - they feature these supposed 'banned books' in their stores in great supply. The premise is that everyone from government to right-wing 'hate' groups are trying to keep you from seeing these books. Isn't this amazing?

The real argument, when you question the advocates long enough, is that they consider restricting access to anything that might be inappropriate to be a violation of free speech. So, for example, an explicit book about the sex lives of lesbians in women's prisons should be in elementary school libraries, with no adult or parental control. Or a website with detailed instructions on constructing a dirty nuclear bomb, including resources and suggested high-population targets should not be taken down. Any attempt to restrict access, or bring down potentially dangerous websites would be a violation of free speech.

These same people pile on top of their lies their own form of supression of free speech. Now, I know bookstores are in the business of making money - they don't care what makes the money - as long as they are making it. Those drawn to work in bookstores, libraries and that sort of business tend to be in it for the literature, not for the political books, computer books, DVD's, or for the money. They tend to be liberal, featuring books that agree with their views and burying the rest. I've seen this over and over again, and often find 'conservative' bestsellers turned over on the shelves, covered with a 'liberal' title, lacking a recommendation, and sometimes outright criticized by the seller (Amazon once lifted their prohibition on ad-hominem attacks on authors exclusively for the book "Unfit For Command").

I live in San Diego and one of the authors of Donkey Cons, Lynn Vincent, lives in San Diego, too. Do you remember when bookstores featured local authors? Not this time. It briefly made it to the New Releases table, then was promptly buried with so many other political books in the back.

It's not my normal practice to read political books. But I must say, I'm getting a wonderful education by reading Donkey Cons. It's extremely well-documented, balanced (the authors bring to light equivalent Republican missteps), and validates many suspicions I've had regarding Democrats.

One last thing - a disclaimer. I know Lynn Vincent. Not well, but her family attended a church which I also attend, and we've had brief conversations at writer's conferences long before I ever knew about this book. I would have heard about it anyway from a radio interview she did with Michael Medved, who I listen to regularly.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conviction vs. Agenda

Last night on Fox News Channel, I caught an interview which included someone (presumably an ACLU attorney) named Michael Gross. John Kasich was moderating between him and a gentleman who I believe is from Washington State regarding the legality of lying about one's opponent in political campaigns.

First, I had to get past the concept that there could even be such a question. Of course it can't be legal to intentially lying about your opponent in a campaign! I was shocked that Mr. Gross not only defended it as Constitutionally protected under the First Amendment, but that Mr. Kasich's example of accusing an opponent of being a member of the American Nazi Party or being a sex offender were, without hesitation, defended by this man! I felt a little ill.

It is apparently in the courts now, and the current position pending appeal is that it IS legal to intentially lie about your opponent in a campaign!

For many years I've been of the opinion that there are people in this country, organized into groups such as the ACLU among others, whose sole purpose is to make a mockery of our Constitution and our founding values so that in time a majority would conclude that it is wholly insufficient, so that they can move forward advancing a Socialist, or even Communist change in government in the United States.

Mr. Gross felt strongly that it is the voter's responsibility to sort out the truth from the lies, and that we can't "sacrifice" free speech by imposing such restrictions as making it a crime to lie in a political campaign. I can't even begin to wrap my head around that! It creates an atmosphere where the best liars gain the advantage, where good, honest people cannot get into office at all, and advances the cause to discredit and abolish our Constitution.

When one takes this little piece of the lefts' thinking and applies it to current events, one begins to see how, in a nation that is basically conservative, there can be even the slightest liberal representation in our elected offices: THEY LIE!

I generally don't read politics, but I've decided to get Donkey Cons, by Lynn Vincent and Robert Stacy McCain and Godless by Ann Coulter. I think these two books will help clarify and reinforce what I've been suspecting. At least I have a good level of confidence that these authors are not lying.

I suspect that there are about 15-20% of American's paying attention in society. The rest just go along with whatever their social circles believe. Since nearly all Americans get their educations from public schools and their news from the networks, it's a wonder that any truth reaches our ears! It seems I've heard survey after survey showing overall conservative values when questions are asked in proper context, yet the voting shows that they're voting against their own values. This inconsistency can only mean that either they aren't paying attention, or that voter fraud is well instituted into our society.

I wish that neither were true, but it's likely that both are. We, as conservatives, possess deeply held convictions that do not, for the most part, take into consideration personal gain or quest for power over others. We simply want good to prevail. People like Mr. Gross possess an agenda, which appears to be to frustrate any good that you and I would seek. Opposition such as this requires serious prayer, and it appears that many of you have been doing so for quite some time, because despite all the lying out there, we have a lot of honest people in the majority.

Thank you for reading my first posting,

Ernie
Improve your life at Ernie's Network
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »